Exploring the Performance Domain Causal Relationship of Digital Government Transformation Project Management
Exploring the Performance Domain Causal Relationship of Digital Government Transformation Project Management |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-72 Issue-3 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Author : Dewi Chomistriana, Agus Taufik Mulyono, Najid |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I3P103 | ||
How to Cite?
Dewi Chomistriana, Agus Taufik Mulyono, Najid, "Exploring the Performance Domain Causal Relationship of Digital Government Transformation Project Management," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 26-39, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I3P103
Abstract
This research determined the specific challenges that are encountered in the Digital Government Transformation (DGT) within the Indonesian construction sector. This research builds upon prior investigations and some theories by examining the impact of project management variables on DGT performance and public value creation. The analysis was conducted using the structural equation model (SEM) with data collected from a survey comprising 140 responses from the project team. The results showed that project performance is predominantly affected by a combination of four factors within the performance domains, namely deliverable/output, measurement, development approach, and project life cycle. In addition, the structural model indicated a significant correlation between the performance of DGT implementation and the attained value. Therefore, ensuring the existence of these factors in DGT project management within the construction industry becomes the key duty of a DGT project manager. The study offered valuable information on improving the administration of DGT projects while also highlighting the results and potential future advancements of the novel framework.
Keywords
Digital government transformation, Performance domain, Project management, Value creation.
References
[1] Construction Services Development Agency, Indonesian Construction Information System, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://siki.pu.go.id/
[2] The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide), 7th ed., Project Management Institute, pp. 1-368, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán et al., Building Digital Government Strategies: Principles and Practices, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-114, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Jean Damascene Twizeyimana, and Annika Andersson, “The Public Value of E-Government-A Literature Review,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 167-178, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Wenlin Bai, “A Public Value Based Framework for Evaluating the Performance of E-Government in China,” iBusiness, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 26-29, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Antonio Cordella, and Carla M. Bonina, “A Public Value Perspective for ICT Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A Theoretical Reflection,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 512-520, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Frank Bannister, and Regina Connolly, “ICT, Public Values and Transformative Government: A Framework and Programme for Research,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 119-128, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Caroline Fischer, Moritz Heuberger, and Moreen Heine, “The Impact of Digitalization in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review,” The Modern State - Magazine for Public Policy, Law and Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Giovanni Liva et al., “Exploring Digital Government Transformation: A Literature Review,” ICEGOV '20: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 502-509, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Ida Lindgren, and Anne Fleur van Veenstra, “Digital Government Transformation: A Case Illustrating Public E-Service Development as Part of Public Sector Transformation,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, pp. 1-6, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Luca Tangi et al., “Digital Government Transformation: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis of Driving and Impeding Factors,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 60, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Luis F. Luna-Reyes, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, “Digital Government Transformation and Internet Portals: The Co-Evolution of Technology, Organizations, and Institutions,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 545-555, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] N. Venkatraman, “IT-Enabled Business Transformation: From Automation to Business Scope Redefinition,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 35, pp. 73-87, 1994.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Kirsten M. Rosacker, and David L. Olson, “Public Sector Information System Critical Success Factors,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 60-70, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Kuldosheva, and Gulnoza, “Challenges and Opportunities of Digital Transformation in the Public Sector in Transition Economies: Examination of the Case of Uzbekistan,” Asian Development Bank Institute, pp. 1-55, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Lisman Manurung, and Fikri Akbarsyah Anza, “Development of E-Government through Public-Private Partnerships in Indonesia,” 1st International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy and Governance Studies (ICAS-PGS 2017) and the 2nd International Conference on Business Administration and Policy (ICBAP 2017), pp. 10-17, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Joseph B. Nyansiro, Joel S. Mtebe, and Mussa M. Kissaka, “E-Government Information Systems (IS) Project Failure in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Literature,” The African Journal of Information and Communication, vol. 28, pp. 1-29, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Demetrios Sarantis et al., “A Critical Assessment of Project Management Methods with Respect to Electronic Government Implementation Challenges,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, vol. 23, pp. 301-321, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Primadhika Marnada et al., “Agile Project Management Challenge in Handling Scope and Change: A Systematic Literature Review,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 197, pp. 290-300, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Kate Dohe, and Robin Pike, “Integration of Project Management Techniques in Digital Projects,” Project Management in the Library Workplace, vol. 38, pp. 151-166, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Mustafa Afyonluoğlu et al., “An E-Government Project Management Approach with E-Transformation Perspective,” International Journal of eBusiness and egovernment Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-33, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Henry A. Hornstein, “The Integration of Project Management and Organizational Change Management is Now a Necessity,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 291-298, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] K.C. Chan, Peter Ong, and Richardus Eko Indrajit, Integrated Project Management, Andi, pp. 1-212, 2004.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Katina Michael, and Keith W. Miller, “Big Data: New Opportunities and New Challenges [Guest Editors’ Introduction],” Computer, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 22-24, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Kristin Helene J. Hafseld, Bassam Hussein, and Antoine B. Rauzy, “An Attempt to Understand Complexity in a Government Digital Transformation Project,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 70-91, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Keld Pedersen, “E-Government Transformations: Challenges and Strategies,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 84-109, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Marius Mikalsen et al., “Agile Digital Transformation: A Case Study of Interdependencies,” Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), San Francisco, pp. 1-9, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Yuji Roh, Geon Heo, and Steven Euijong Whang, “A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: A Big Data - AI Integration Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1328-1347, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Ana Cláudia de Souza, Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre, and Edinêis de Brito Guirardello, “Psychometric Properties in Instruments Evaluation of Reliability and Validity,” Epidemiology and Health Services, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 649-659, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Joseph F. Hair et al., An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling, Springer, Cham, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R, pp. 1-29, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Bo Xiong, Martin Skitmore, and Bo Xia, “A Critical Review of Structural Equation Modeling Applications in Construction Research,” Automation in Construction, vol. 49, pp. 59-70, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Gary Klein, and Ralf Müller, “Quantitative Research Submissions to Project Management Journal®,” Project Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 263-265, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Hamad Al-Muftah et al., “Factors Influencing E-Diplomacy Implementation: Exploring Causal Relationships Using Interpretive Structural Modelling,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 502-514, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Gonçalo Paiva Dias, “Determinants of E-Government Implementation at the Local Level: An Empirical Model,” Online Information Review, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1307-1326, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Endang Sulistiyani, and Tony Dwi Susanto, “A Conceptual Model of Change Management for E-Government Project in Indonesia,” IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, no. 1, pp. 39-42, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] E-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development, United Nations Publication: New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-219, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] K.M. Sam, and C.R. Chatwin, “Understanding Adoption of Big Data Analytics in China: From Organizational Users Perspective,” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 507-510, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Korb Srinavin et al., “Readiness of Applying Big Data Technology for Construction Management in Thai Public Sector,” Journal of Advances in Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-5, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Gregory Vial, “Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118-144, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Prince Aian G. Villanueva, “Institutional Change, Corruption and E-Government Transformation in the Philippines: The Benigno Simeon Aquino III administration,” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 463-471, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Olusoyi Richard Ashaye, and Zahir Irani, “The Role of Stakeholders in the Effective Use of E-Government Resources in Public Services,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 49, pp. 253-270, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Yiwei Gong, Jun Yang, and Xiaojie Shi, “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Digital Transformation in Government: Analysis of Flexibility and Enterprise Architecture,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Christopher Wilson, and Ines Mergel, “Overcoming Barriers to Digital Government: Mapping the Strategies of Digital Champions,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Hicham Nachit et al., “Digital Transformation in the Moroccan Public Sector: Drivers and Barriers,” SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-26, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Rana Tassabehji, Ray Hackney, and Aleš Popovič, “Emergent Digital Era Governance: Enacting the Role of the ‘Institutional Entrepreneur’ in Transformational Change,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 223-236, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Ewa Ziemba, Tomasz Papaj, and Rafal Zelazny, “A Model of Success Factors for E-Government Adoption-the Case of Poland,” International Association for Computer Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87-100, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 2019 Concerning One Indonesian Data, Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, pp. 1-35, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Luis F. Luna-Reyes et al., “Understanding Public Value Creation in the Delivery of Electronic Services,” International Conference on Electronic Government, pp. 378-385, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Joseph F. Hair et al., “When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM,” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2- 24, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] J. Ramón Gil-García, and Theresa A. Pardo, “E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187-216, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Suresh Malodia et al., “Future of E-Government: An Integrated Conceptual Framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 173, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán et al., Building Digital Government Strategies: Principles and Practices, Cham: Springer International Publishing, vol. 16, pp. 1-114, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Amizan Omar, Vishanth Weerakkody, and Ahmad Daowd, “Studying Transformational Government: A Review of the Existing Methodological Approaches and Future Outlook,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]