International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 8 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I8P104 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I8P104

Hybrid Resampling and Ensemble Learning for Predicting Radiation-Induced Pneumonitis in Head and Neck Cancer


Abhijit Nath, Sheikh Wakie Masood, Shahin Ara Begum, Ravi Kannan

Received Revised Accepted Published
21 Jan 2026 18 Jun 2026 24 Jun 2026 29 Aug 2026

Citation :

Abhijit Nath, Sheikh Wakie Masood, Shahin Ara Begum, Ravi Kannan, "Hybrid Resampling and Ensemble Learning for Predicting Radiation-Induced Pneumonitis in Head and Neck Cancer," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 50-67, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I8P104

Abstract

Radiation-Induced Pneumonitis (RP) is a clinically important but difficult-to-predict toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC), particularly when only routinely collected hospital variables are available. This study developed a recall-oriented machine learning framework for RP prediction using clinical and treatment-related data from 2,482 HNC patients treated with radiotherapy between 2018 and 2024. Twenty-five baseline variables and four engineered interaction terms were analysed using a stratified 70/30 train–test split. Three phase-wise experiments were performed: Phase I on the original imbalanced training data, Phase II with SMOTETomek-based class balancing, and Phase III as an extension of Phase II with Gaussian-noise data augmentation. XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and SVM were evaluated as individual classifiers, while the proposed stacking classifier combined XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost with Logistic Regression as the meta-learner. Hyperparameters were optimized by Bayesian search with stratified cross-validation, and thresholds were selected from training-only out-of-fold probabilities using F2-score as the primary criterion. In Phase I, the stacking classifier achieved the highest F2-score 0.57 and recall 0.86. In Phase II, the stacking classifier achieved the highest F2-score 0.58 and ROC-AUC 0.67. In Phase III, it again performed best overall, with a precision 0.24, recall 0.92, F2-score 0.59, and ROC-AUC 0.65. These findings support stacking-based prediction as a screening-oriented aid for identifying high-risk RP cases from routinely available hospital records.

Keywords

Head and Neck Cancer, Radiotherapy, Radiation-Induced Pneumonitis, Data augmentation, Ensemble learning.

References

[1] Suzanne Tanya Nethan, Shalini Gupta, and Saman Warnakulasuriya, Risk Factors for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Indian Population, Microbes and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Springer, Singapore, pp. 9-40, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Debojyoti Roy et al., “Profiling of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Lower Assam Region – A Hospital-based Retrospective Study,” Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 240-243, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Feihu Chen et al., “Re-Evaluating the Risk Factors for Radiation Pneumonitis in the Era of Immunotherapy,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Marisol Arroyo-Hernández et al., “Radiation-Induced Lung Injury: Current Evidence,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Fengsong Ye et al., “Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer: A EUD-based Machine Learning Approach for VMAT Patients,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 14, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Zhi Chen et al., “Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer using Machine Learning and Multimodal Features: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy,” BMC Cancer, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Yoshiyuki Katsuta et al., “Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis with Machine Learning using 4D-CT-based Dose-Function Features,” Journal of Radiation Research, vol.  63, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] N.V. Chawla et al., “SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321-357, 2002.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Haibo He, and Edwardo A. Garcia, “Learning from Imbalanced Data,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1263-1284, 2009.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Heesoon Sheen et al., “Radiomics-based Hybrid Model for Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Physica Medica, vol. 123, pp. 1-9, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] David H. Wolpert, “Stacked Generalization,” Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 241-259, 1992.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Tianqi Chen, and Carlos Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States, pp. 785-794, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Guolin Ke et al., “LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Corinna Cortes, and Vladimir Vapnik, “Support-Vector Networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273-297, 1995.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Peter I. Frazier, “A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-22, 2018.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Alaa Tharwat, “Classification Assessment Methods,” Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168-192, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Tom Fawcett, “An Introduction to ROC Analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861-874, 2006.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Jingli Tang et al., “Radiation Pneumonitis Prediction using Dual-Modal Data Fusion based on Med3D Transfer Network,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2085-2101, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Kyu Hye Choi et al., “Using Deep Learning to Predict Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Pulmonary Nodules: Preliminary Results,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 460-470, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Yan Kong et al., “Enhancing the Prediction of Symptomatic Radiation Pneumonitis for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Combining 3D Deep Learning-Derived Imaging Features with Dose–Volume Metrics: A Two-Center Study,” Radiation Oncology and Oncology, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 274-282, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Jang Hyung Lee et al., “Deep-Learning Model Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis using Pretreatment Chest CT and Clinical Factors,” Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 23, pp. 1-11, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] Liming Sheng et al., “Radiation Pneumonia Predictive Model for Radiotherapy in Oesophageal Carcinoma Patients,” BMC Cancer, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Rutger H. Stoffers et al., “Rising Incidence of Radiation Pneumonitis After Adjuvant Durvalumab in NSCLC Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 64, pp. 267-275, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] M. Athiyaman et al., “A Physicist Description of Indigenous Telecobalt Machine Bhabhatron-II TAW,” Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 105-110, 2015.
[
Google Scholar]

[25] National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, NCI, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://dctd.cancer.gov/research/ctep-trials/for-sites/adverse-events/ctcae-v5-5x7.pdf