Citation :

K. Gomathy, C. Nagarani, K. Gomathy, "Intelligent Cluster Head Selection and Aquila Optimizer Based Multi-Objective Routing (AOMOR) Protocol with Digital Twin Simulation for VANET," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 278-293, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I8P119

Abstract

The next-generation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) use Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. This facilitates real-time vehicle-roadside infrastructure communication. However, maintaining stable cluster topologies and guaranteeing consistent Quality of Service is problematic because of VANETs intrinsic high mobility and adaptable topology. In this paper, proposed a Self-Adaptive Marine Predators Algorithm (SAMPA) with an Aquila Optimizer-based Multi-Objective Routing (AOMOR) strategy for Cluster Head Selection (CHS). Instead of demanding all nodes to maintaining links over the entire network, the local interactions among clusters facilitates in lowering the routing complexity. SAMPA, a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm, models the foraging strategies of marine predators in their search for prey. It is employed here to select the most suitable CHs by solving a Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) problem that balances key metrics, including Node Density (ND), Residual Energy (RE), mobility, Link Quality (LQ), and Connectivity Degree (CD). For the routing process, AOMOR employs the hunting strategies of Aquila (eagle) species, which ivolnve searching, swooping, and attacking behaviors, to determine the optimal communication path. Mean Routing Load (MRL), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), throughput, End-to-End (E2E) delay, and Control Packet Overhead (CPO) represent several of the objectives, are taken into account by QoS-aware routing. To further enhance adaptability, the Digital Twin technology is integrated in the suggested method, which facilitates real-time analysis of network activities, traffic prediction, and informed decision-making for routing strategies. Proposed structure in improving the efficiency of CHS and improving QoS provisioning in VANETs are demonstrated by evaluating its performance using important metrics such as PDR, Packet Loss Ratio (PLR), E2E delay, throughput, and Average Residual Energy (ARE).

Keywords

VANET, Self-Adaptive Marine Predators Algorithm (SAMPA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), Optimal CH selection, Routing, Clustering, Digital twin, and Optimized framework.

References

[1] Muath Obaidat et al., Security and Privacy Challenges in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, Connected Vehicles in the Internet of Things, Springer, pp. 223-251, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Fayaz Hassan et al., “Achieving Model Explainability for Intrusion Detection in VANETS with LIME,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 9, pp.1-18, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Rezoan Ahmed Nazib, and Sangman Moh, “Routing Protocols for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Aided Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 77535-77560, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] S. Ansari et al., “MHAV: Multitier Heterogeneous Adaptive Vehicular Network with LTE and DSRC,” ICT Express, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 199-203, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[5] Yu-Yen Chen, and Pi-Chung Wang, “Efficient Clustering of Visible Light Communications in VANET,” Inventions, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] B. Suganthi, and P. Ramamoorthy, “An Advanced Fitness-based Routing Protocol for Improving QoS in VANET,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 114, no.  1, pp. 241-263, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7]  Mengying Ren et al., “A Review of Clustering Algorithms in VANETs,” Annals of Telecommunications, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 581-603, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Mays Kareem Jabbar, and Hafedh Trabelsi “Clustering Review in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks: Algorithms, Comparisons, Challenges and Solutions,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 25-48, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[9] Abhay Katiyar, Dinesh Singh, and Rama Shankar Yadav, “State-of-the-Art Approach to Clustering Protocols in VANET: A Survey,” Wireless Networks, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 5307-5336, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[10] Mohammed Saad Talib et al., “A Center-based Stable Evolving Clustering Algorithm with Grid Partitioning and Extended Mobility Features for VANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 169908-169921, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Radhakrishna Karne, and T.K. Sreeja, “Clustering Algorithms and Comparisons in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 115-123, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Forough Goudarzi, and Hamid Asgari, “Non-Cooperative Beacon Rate and Awareness Control for Vanets,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 16858-16870, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Tarik El Ouahmani, Abdellah Chehri, and Nadir Hakem, “Bio-Inspired Routing Protocol in VANET Networks-A Case Study,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 159, pp. 2384-2393, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Vinita Jindal, and Punam Bedi, “An Improved Hybrid Ant Particle Optimization (IHAPO) Algorithm for Reducing Travel Time in VANETs,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 64, pp. 526-535, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Yasir Ali Shah et al., “CAMONET: Moth-Flame Optimization (MFO) based Clustering Algorithm for VANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 48611-48624, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Christy Jackson Joshua, Rekha Duraisamy, and Vijayakumar Varadarajan, “A Reputation based Weighted Clustering Protocol in VANET: A Multi-Objective Firefly Approach,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1199-1209, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Tony Santhosh Gnanasekar, and Dhandapani Samiappan, “Impact of Hybridized Rider Optimization with Cuckoo Search Algorithm on Optimal VANET Routing,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 1-21, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Sami Abduljabbar Rashid et al., “Reliability-Aware Multi-Objective Optimization-based Routing Protocol for VANETs using Enhanced Gaussian Mutation Harmony Searching,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 26613-26627, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Ghassan Husnain et al., “A Bio-Inspired Cluster Optimization Schema for Efficient Routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs),” Energies, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Madhuri Husan Badole, and Anuradha D. Thakare, “An Optimized Framework for VANET Routing: A Multi-Objective Hybrid Model for Data Synchronization with Digital Twin,” International Journal of Intelligent Networks, vol. 4, pp. 272-282, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] A. Maria Christina Blessy, and S. Brindha, “Maximizing VANET Performance in Cluster Head Selection using Intelligent Fuzzy Bald Eagle Optimization,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 45, 2024.
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[22] Jianhang Liu et al., “A Self-Healing Routing Strategy based on Ant Colony Optimization for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 22, pp. 22695-22708, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[23] V. Krishna Meera, C. Balasubramanian, and R. Praveen, “Hybrid Hippopotamus Optimization Algorithm-based Energy‐Efficient Stable Cluster Construction Protocol for Data Routing in VANETs,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 1-22, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] Xiang Ji et al., “Efficient and Reliable Cluster‐based Data Transmission for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2018, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[25] Ye Chun et al., “Improved Marine Predators’ Algorithm for Engineering Design Optimization Problems,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Buddhadev Sasmal et al., “A Comprehensive Survey on Aquila Optimizer,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 4449-4476, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] Laith Abualigah et al., “Aquila Optimizer: Review, Results and Applications,” Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms, pp. 89-103, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Sylia Mekhmoukh Taleb et al., A Comprehensive Survey of Aquila Optimizer: Theory, Variants, Hybridization, and Applications,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 4643-4689, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]