Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 7 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I7P104 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P104Optimal Battery Storage Sizing and Strategic Operation in Renewable Energy Integrated Grid using Roulette Chaotic Pelican Optimisation Algorithm
Ifeoluwa Titilayo Akinola, Yanxia Sun, Isaiah Gbadegesin Adebayo, Zenghui Wang
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb 2025 | 08 Jan 2026 | 03 Jun 2026 | 28 Jul 2026 |
Citation :
Ifeoluwa Titilayo Akinola, Yanxia Sun, Isaiah Gbadegesin Adebayo, Zenghui Wang, "Optimal Battery Storage Sizing and Strategic Operation in Renewable Energy Integrated Grid using Roulette Chaotic Pelican Optimisation Algorithm," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 34-54, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P104
Abstract
The incorporation of Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) into the power grids poses a considerable challenge due to the intermittent nature of their production. Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) eliminate such problems by absorbing excess generation during peaks and providing stored charge at troughs. This leads to the fact that identifying a suitable BESS size is important to ensure a trade-off between cost-efficiency and grid stability, as inappropriately sized systems would lead to inefficiency, high capital and operating costs, and reduced reliability. This study uses the Roulette Chaotic Pelican Optimisation Algorithm (RCPOA) to optimise BESS sizing in RES-integrated grids. RCPOA outperforms at least five out of seven algorithms across 23 classical benchmarks. It excels in the CEC 2019 benchmarks, ranking first in the Friedman rank test, demonstrating its robustness compared to other state-of-the-art algorithms. Its success extends to the 'tension spring design' constraint problem, underscoring its versatility in different optimisation contexts. Simulations validate RCPOA's capability to determine optimal BESS sizes, enhancing grid performance and cost efficiency. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses show that changes in State of Charge (SOC) minimum limits, battery efficiency, and range of capacities all affect the optimal battery capacity greatly. By comparison, minimum capital costs are relatively stable and are only highly sensitive to the costs of operations and maintenance, a shortfall in demand, and the cost of grid energy. These results confirm the usefulness of RCPOA to optimise BESS setup in renewable energy solutions, indicating potential to promote economic and operational goals in current power systems.
Keywords
Battery sizing, Energy Storage, Grid Stability, Optimisation algorithm, Algorithm modification.
References
[1] Ruixiaoxiao Zhang et al., “Optimization of
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Sizing in Different Electricity Market
Types Considering BESS Utilization Mechanisms and Ownerships,” Journal of
Cleaner Production, vol. 470, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Yuqing Yang et al., “Battery Energy Storage
System Size Determination in Renewable Energy Systems: A Review,” Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 91, pp. 109-125, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Dlzar Al
kez et al., “A Critical Evaluation of Grid Stability and Codes , Energy Storage
and Smart Loads in Power Systems with Wind Generation,” Energy, vol.
205, pp. 1-22, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Amela Ajanovic, Albert Hiesl, and Reinhard
Haas, “On the Role of Storage for Electricity in Smart Energy Systems,” Energy,
vol. 200, pp. 1-18, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Apar Chitransh, and Ranjit Kumar Bindal, “A
Review on Energy Storage System of Smart Grid System,” International Journal
of Science and Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 38-43, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Olalekan Kunle
Ajiboye et al., “A Review of Hybrid Renewable Energies Optimisation: Design,
Methodologies, and Criteria,” International Journal of Sustainable Energy,
vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 648-684, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Yijie
Zhang, Tao Ma, and Hongxing Yang, “A Review on Capacity Sizing and Operation
Strategy of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Battery Systems,” Energy and Built
Environment, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 500-516, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Pavel
Trojovský, and Mohammad Dehghani, “Pelican Optimization Algorithm: A Novel
Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Engineering Applications,” Sensors, vol.
22, no. 3, pp. 1-34, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[9] K. Anjani
Parvathi, N.C. Kotaiah, and K. Radha Rani, “Pelican Optimization Algorithm for
Optimal Demand Response in Islanded Active Distribution Network Considering
Controllable Loads,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and
Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 132-141, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[10] Anuj Kumar
et al., “Modified Wild Horse Optimizer for Constrained System Reliability
Optimization,” Axioms, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[11] Asmita
Ajay Rathod, and S. Balaji, “Optimization of Stand-Alone Hybrid Renewable
Energy System based on Techno-Socio-Enviro-Financial Perspective using Improved
Red-Tailed Hawk Algorithm,” Applied Energy, vol. 376, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Roya
AhmadiAhangar et al., “Impacts of Grid-Scale Battery Systems on Power System
Operation, Case of Baltic Region,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 2, pp.
101-119, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Saman
Korjani et al., “Battery Management for Energy Communities-Economic Evaluation
of an Artificial Intelligence-Led System,” Journal of Cleaner Production,
vol. 314, pp. 1-36, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Abed Kazemtarghi,
and Ayan Mallik, “Techno-Economic Microgrid Design Optimization Considering
Fuel Procurement Cost and Battery Energy Storage System Lifetime Analysis,” Electric
Power Systems Research, vol. 235, pp. 1-31, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Mohammed
Atta Abdulgalil, Muhammad Khalid, and Fahad Alismail, “Optimal Sizing of
Battery Energy Storage for a Wind Uncertainties,” Energies, vol. 12, no.
12, pp. 1-29, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[16] Umar T.
Salman, Fahad Al-Ismail Saleh, and Khalid Muhammad, “Optimal Sizing of
Battery Energy Storage for Grid-Connected and Isolated Wind-Penetrated
Microgrid,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 91129-91138, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[17] Sharmistha
Sharma, Subhadeep Bhattacharjee, and Aniruddha Bhattacharya, “Grey Wolf
Optimisation for Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage Device to Minimise
Operation Cost of Microgrid,” IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 625-637, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Mamood
Gholizadeh, and Martin Wolter, “Cost-Beneficial Analysis of Utilizing a
Combination of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Sources,” 2020 55th
International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Turin, Italy, pp.
1-5, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[19] Polamarasetty
P. Kumar, and Rajeshwer Prasad Saini, “Optimization of an Off-Grid Integrated
Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Various Energy Storage Technologies using Different
Dispatch Strategies,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and
Environmental Effects, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 274-303, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Mohammad
Amini et al., “Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage in a Microgrid
Considering Capacity Degradation and Replacement Year,” Electric Power
Systems Research, vol. 195, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] M. Faisal
et al., “Particle Swarm Optimised Fuzzy Controller for Charging-Discharging and
Scheduling of Battery Energy Storage System in MG Applications,” Energy
Reports, vol. 6, pp. 215-228, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] MohammadReza
AkbaiZadeh, Taher Niknam, and Abdollah Kavousi-Fard, “Adaptive Robust
Optimization for the Energy Management of the Grid-Connected Energy Hubs based
on Hybrid Meta-Heuristic Algorithm,” Energy, vol. 235, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Qi Xiong,
Jincheng She, and Jinkun Xiong, “A New Pelican Optimization Algorithm for the
Parameter Identification of Memristive Chaotic System,” Symmetry, vol.
15, no. 6, p. 1-13, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[24] K.M. Ang
et al., “Modified Particle Swarm Optimization with Chaotic Initialization
Scheme for Unconstrained Optimization Problems,” Mekatronika, vol. 3,
no. 1, pp. 35-43, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Feyza
Altunbey Özbay, “A Modified Seahorse Optimization Algorithm based on Chaotic
Maps for Solving Global Optimization and Engineering Problems,” Engineering
Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 41, pp. 1-26, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Kamini
Shahare, “Performance Analysis and Comparison of Various Techniques for
Short-Term Load Forecasting,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 799-808, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Khaidem
Bidyanath, Sanasam Dhanabanta Singh, and Shuma Adhikari, “Implementation of
Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Voltage Profile
Improvement and Loss Reduction using Capacitors in 132 KV Manipur Transmission
System,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 738-746, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Cristina
Bianca Pop et al., “Review of Bio-Inspired Optimization Applications in
Renewable-Powered Smart Grids : Emerging Population-based Metaheuristics,” Energy
Reports, vol. 8, pp. 11769-11798, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Peiyao
Yang et al., “Application of Improved Chimp Optimization Algorithm Integrating
Multiple Strategies in Reservoirs Optimization Operation,” Expert Systems
with Applications, vol. 285, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Kumeshan Reddy, and Akshay
K. Saha, “A Modified Whale Optimization Algorithm for Exploitation Capability and
Stability Enhancement,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1-11, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Vamsi
Krishna Reddy Aala Kalananda, and Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Komanapalli, “A
Combinatorial Social Group Whale Optimization Algorithm for Numerical and
Engineering Optimization Problems,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 99,
2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Heming Jia
et al., “Improved Sandcat Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Solving Global
Optimum Problems,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1-38, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] S. Vikram
Singh et al., “Enhancing Microgrid Stability: Optimal BESS Sizing via Modified
PSO for Frequency Control and Cost Efficiency,” 2024 7th
International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics, Greater
Noida, India, pp. 627-632, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[34] Sahar
Saeedi et al., “Improved Many-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
for Scientific Workflow Scheduling in Cloud Computing,” Computers
and Industrial Engineering, vol. 147,
2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Sumit
Kumar et al., “Chaotic Marine Predators Algorithm for Global Optimization of
Real-World Engineering Problems,” Knowledge-based Systems, vol. 261,
2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Hamed
Khosravi et al., “An Improved Group Teaching Optimization Algorithm based on
Local Search and Chaotic Map for Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Data,” Expert
Systems with Applications, vol. 204, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Esin Ayşe
Zaimoğlu et al., “A Binary Chaotic Horse Herd Optimization Algorithm for
Feature Selection,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International
Journal, vol. 44, pp. 1-22, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Ruba Abu
Khurma et al., “A Review of the Modification Strategies of the Nature Inspired
Algorithms for Feature Selection Problem,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 3,
pp. 1-45, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[39] Hao Liu,
Hongbin Dong, and Jing Zhou, “Feature Selection Method based on Hybrid
Multi-Strategy Pelican Optimization Algorithm,” 2023 6th International
Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering, Mianyang, China,
pp. 59-63, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[40] Hao-Ming
Song et al., “Improved Pelican Optimization Algorithm with Chaotic Interference
Factor and Elementary Mathematical Function,” Soft
Computing, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 10607-10646, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Ziqiang
Zhang, and Yixin Zhao, “Mixed Strategy-based Improved Pelican Optimization
Algorithm,” 2023 4th International Symposium on Computer
Engineering and Intelligent Communications, Nanjing, China, pp. 428-433,
2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[42] Purba Daru
Kusuma, and Anggunmeka Luhur Prasasti, “Guided Pelican Algorithm,” International
Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp.
179-190, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[43] Chun Qing
Li, Zheng Feng Jiang, and Yong Ping Huang, “Multi-Strategy Improved Pelican
Optimization Algorithm for Mobile Robot Path Planning,” Information
Technology and Control, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 372-389, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Xiaohan
Zhao et al., “Enhancement Method based on Multi-Strategy Improved Pelican
Optimization Algorithm and Application to Low-Illumination Forest Canopy
Images,” Forests, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1-30, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[45] Lingzhi Yi
et al., “A Multi-Objective Pelican Optimization Algorithm for Dynamic
Reconfiguration of Multi-Type Rural Rooftop PV Array,” Journal of
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology,
vol. 47, no. 5-6, pp. 393-409, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Y. Ramu
Naidu, “Multi-objective Pelican Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Design
Problems,” Distributed Computing and Intelligent Technology: 19th
International Conference, ICDCIT 2023, Bhubaneswar, India, pp. 362-368,
2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Xizhai Ge
et al., “A Hyperchaotic Map with Distance-Increasing Pairs of Coexisting
Attractors and its Application in the Pelican Optimization Algorithm,” Chaos,
Solitons and Fractals, vol. 173, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Amit Raj,
Parul Punia, and Pawan Kumar, “A Novel Hybrid Pelican-Particle Swarm
Optimization Algorithm (HPPSO) for Global Optimization Problem,” International
Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 15, no. 8, pp.
3878-3893, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] SeyedDavoud
SeyedGarmroudi et al., “Improved Pelican Optimization Algorithm for Solving
Load Dispatch Problems,” Energy, vol. 289, pp. 1-32, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Gokulakrishnan
Sriram et al., “Dynamics of a Novel Chaotic Map,” Journal of Computational
and Applied Mathematics, vol. 436, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Rasika B.
Naik, and Udayprakash Singh, “A Review on Applications of Chaotic Maps in
Pseudo-Random Number Generators and Encryption,” Annals of Data Science,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25-50, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Herman
Herman et al., “Scheduling using Genetic Algorithm and Roulette Wheel Selection
Method Considering Lecturer Time,” Journal Information of Technology and its
Utilization, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 24-28, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Rosshairy
Abd Rahman et al., “Evolutionary Algorithm with Roulette-Tournament Selection
for Solving Aquaculture Diet Formulation,” Mathematical Problems in
Engineering, vol. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] G.S.
Geethamani, and M. Mayilvaganan, “Analysis of Genetic Crossover Techniques
based on Roulette Wheel Selection Algorithm and Steady State Selection
Algorithm,” International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science,
vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15428-15431, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[55] Asaad
Shakir Hameed et al., “Appling the Roulette Wheel Selection Approach to Address
the Issues of Premature Convergence and Stagnation in the Discrete Differential
Evolution Algorithm,” Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing,
vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] I.M.
El-Desoky et al., “A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Job Shop Scheduling
Problems,” International Journal of Advancement in Engineering, Technology
and Computer Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6-17, 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[57] Warrick
Pierce, and Monique Le Roux, “Statistics of Utility-Scales Power Generation in
South Africa,” CSIR Energy Center, pp. 1-122, 2023.
[Google Scholar]
[58] Chnoor M.
Rahman, and Tarik A. Rashid, “A New Evolutionary Algorithm: Learner Performance
based Behavior Algorithm,” Egyptian Informatics Journal, vol. 22, no. 2,
pp. 213-223, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[59] Jaza
Mahmood Abdullah, and Tarik Ahmed, “Fitness Dependent Optimizer: Inspired by
the Bee Swarming Reproductive Process,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 43473-43486,
2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[60] Janez
Brest, Mirjam Sepesy Maučec, and Borko Bošković, “The 100-Digit Challenge:
Algorithm jDE100,” 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation,
Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 19-26,
2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[61] Gulin
Zeynep Oztas, and Sabri Erdem, “A Penalty-based Algorithm Proposal for
Engineering Optimization Problems,” Neural Computing and Applications,
vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 7635-7658, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[62] Saeed
Rafee Nekoo, José Ángel Acosta, and Anibal Ollero, “A Search Algorithm for
Constrained Engineering Optimization and Tuning the Gains of Controllers,” Expert
Systems with Applications, vol. 206, pp. 1-27, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[63] Chalermjit
Klansupar, and Surachai Chaitusaney, “Optimal Sizing of Grid-Scaled Battery
with Consideration of Battery Installation and System Power-Generation Costs,” Energies,
vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1-18, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[64] Jonas
Engels, Bert Claessens, and Geert Deconinck, “Optimal Combination of Frequency
Control and Peak Shaving with Battery Storage Systems,” IEEE Transactions on
Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3270-3279, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]