Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 7 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I7P107 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P107BBFS-LSTM-AE: An Optimized Intrusion Detection Model for Securing IoT Networks
Nancy Thomas, R. Gunasundari
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2025 | 30 May 2026 | 18 Jun 2026 | 28 Jul 2026 |
Citation :
Nancy Thomas, R. Gunasundari, "BBFS-LSTM-AE: An Optimized Intrusion Detection Model for Securing IoT Networks," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 96-117, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P107
Abstract
Rapid growth in Internet of Things (IoT) devices has expanded the attack surface of modern-day networks. Therefore, it is imperative to deploy an IoT Intrusion Detection System (IDS) for secure communication and reliable operation. However, traditional IDS systems are often inefficient when dealing with high-dimensional data, new attack strategies, and severe imbalanced data problems, leading to low detection performance and high false alarms. In order to solve these problems, this paper introduces a novel intelligent IDS system using the Feature Selection technique inspired by Bowerbird Courtship (BBFS) and Long Short-Term Memory Autoencoder (LSTM-AE) using Seagull Optimizer (SGO). The most important objective here is to build an effective and scalable IDS that can perform efficient feature selection, learn deep temporal dependencies, and tune its hyperparameters to classify malicious and benign traffic more effectively. In this way, we consider all aspects of data preprocessing, feature optimization, balancing, and classification, overcoming the limitations of existing techniques. The evaluation of the CIC IoT 2023 intrusion dataset proves the efficiency of the model, which is shown by high scores: 99.63% of accuracy, 99.55% of detection rate, 99.71% of precision, and 99.59% of F1 score. As seen from the comparison with other models, the BBFS-LSTM-AE-SGO model is better than the compared model in terms of all metrics. It means that the proposed IDS can detect various types of attacks with minimum errors. All through this research has made way for the design of a novel, optimized IoT-IDS model that thereby strengthens cybersecurity resilience, supports real-time monitoring, and hence advances the intrusion detection for IoT-enabled environments.
Keywords
BBFS, CIC-IoT-2023, Deep learning, IoT, Intrusion detection, LSTM-AE, SGO.
References
[1] Arjun Kumar Bose Arnob et
al., “A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Intrusion Detection Systems: Emerging
Techniques, Challenges, and Future Research Directions,” Journal of Edge
Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73-104, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[2] Ya Zhang, Ravie Chandren Muniyandi, and Faizan
Qamar, “A Review of Deep Learning Applications in Intrusion Detection Systems:
Overcoming Challenges in Spatiotemporal Feature Extraction and Data Imbalance,”
Applied Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[3] Md Mahbubur Rahman,
Shaharia Al Shakil, and Mizanur Rahman Mustakim, “A Survey on Intrusion
Detection System in IoT Network,” Cyber Security and Application, vol.
3, pp. 1-19, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[4] Nuha A. Hamad et al.,
“Systematics Analysis of Federated Learning Approaches for Intrusion Detection
in the Internet of Things Environment,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp.
95410-95444, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[5] S. Kumar Reddy Mallidi, and
Rajeswara Rao Ramisetty, “Optimizing Intrusion Detection for IoT: A Systematic
Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches with Feature Selection
and Data Balancing,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Data Mining and
Knowledges Discovery, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-42, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[6] Saeid Jamshidi et al.,
“Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intrusion Detection in Internet
of Things: A Systematic Review,” Internet of Things, vol. 31, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[7] Márton Bendegúz Bankó et
al., “Advancements in Machine Learning-based Intrusion Detection in IoT:
Research Trends and Challenges,” Algorithms, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1-34,
2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[8] Imane Rakine et al.,
“Comprehensive Review of Intrusion Detection Techniques: ML and DL in Different
Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 104345-104367, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[9] Tamara Al-Shurbaji et al.,
“Deep Learnings-based Intrusions Detections Systems for Detecting IoT Botnet
Attack: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 11792-11822, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[10] S. Kumar Reddy Mallidi, and
Rajeswara Rao Ramisetty, “Advancements in Training and Deployment Strategies
for AI-based Intrusion Detection Systems in IoT: A Systematic Literature
Review,” Discover Internet of Things, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-33, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[11] Mohammad Shamim Ahsan, Salekul
Islam, and Swakkhar Shatabda, “A Systematic Review of Metaheuristics-based and
Machine Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection Systems in IoT,” Swarm and
Evolutionary Computations, vol. 96, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[12] Muhannad Almohaimeed et
al., “Use of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Intrusion Detection for
IoT,” Advances in Internet of Things, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 17-32, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[13] Emanuel Krzysztoń, Izabela
Rojek, and Dariusz Mikołajewski, “A Comparative Analysis of Anomaly Detection
Methods in IoT Networks: An Experimental Study,” Applied Sciences, vol.
14, no. 24, pp. 1-22, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[14] Hidangmayum Satyajeet
Sharma, and Khundrakpam Johnson Singh, “A Genetic Algorithm based Feature
Selection and CNN based Ensemble Model for Intrusion Detection in IoT Smart
Environments,” Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (JSIR),
vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 48-59, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[15] Akinul Islam Jony, and
Arjun Kumar Bose Arnob, “A Long Short-Term Memory based Approach for Detecting
Cyber Attacks in IoT using CIC-IoT2023 Dataset,” Journal of Edge Computing,
vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28-42, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[16] Sheikh Abdul Wahab et al.,
“A Multi-Class Intrusion Detection System for DDoS Attacks in IoT Networks
using Deep Learning and Transformers,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 15, pp.
1-35, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[17] Shahbaz Ahmad Khanday, Hoor
Fatima, and Nitin Rakesh, “A Novel Data Preprocessing Model for Lightweight
Sensory IoT Intrusions Detections,” International Journal of Mathematical,
Engineering and Managements Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 188-204, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
[18] Zaed S. Mahdi, Rana M.
Zaki, and Laith Alzubaidi, “A Secure and Adaptive Framework for Enhancing
Intrusion Detection in IoT Networks using Incremental Learning and Blockchain,”
Security and Privacy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-17, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[19] Zaed S. Mahdi, Rana M.
Zaki, and Laith Alzubaidi, “Advanced Hybrid Techniques for Cyberattack
Detection and Defense in IoT Networks,” Security and Privacy, vol. 8,
no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[20] Farhan Ullah et al.,
“Enhanced Network Intrusion Detection System for Internet of Things Security
using Multimodal Big Data Representation with Transfer Learning and Game
Theory,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1-31, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[21] Ram Ji, Neerendra Kumar,
and Devanand Padha, “Hybrid Enhanced Intrusion Detection Frameworks for
Cyber-Physical Systems via Optimal Features Selection,” Indian Journal of
Sciences and Technology, vol. 17, no. 30, pp. 3069-3079, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[22] Bambang Susilo, Abdul Muis,
and Riri Fitri Sari, “Intelligent Intrusion Detection System Against Various
Attacks based on a Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithm,” Sensors, vol. 25,
no. 2, pp. 1-26, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[23] Kayode S. Adewole, Andreas
Jacobsson, and Paul Davidsson, “Intrusion Detection Framework for Internet of
Things with Rule Induction for Model Explanation,” Sensors, vol. 25, no.
6, pp. 1-27, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[24] Sami Yaras, and Murat
Dener, “IoT-based Intrusion Detection System using New Hybrid Deep Learning
Algorithm,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1-28, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[25] Shu-Ming Tseng, Yan-Qi
Wang, and, Yung-Chung Wang “Multi-Class Intrusions Detections based on
Transformers for IoT Network using CIC-IoT 2023 DataSet,” Future Internet,
vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1-25, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[26] Akinul Islam Jony, and Arjun Kumar Bose Arnob, “Securing the Internet of Things:
Evaluating Machine Learnings Algorithm for Detecting IoT Cyberattack using CIC
IoT2023 DataSet,” International Journal of Information Technology and
Computer Science, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 56-65, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[27] Hadeel Q. Gheni, and Wathiq
L. Al-Yaseen, “Two-Steps Data Clustering for Improved Intrusions Detections
Systems using CIC IOT2023 DataSet,” e-Prime-Advance in Electrical
Engineering, Electronics and Energy, vol. 9, pp. 1-8, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[28] Md. Meheraj Hossain et al.,
“A Cross-Dataset based Zero-Day Intrusion Detection System by Integrating
Siamese Network and Reinforcement Learning,” ICT Express, vol. 12, no.
3, pp. 752-757, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[29] Jiantao Cui, and Yixiang
Zhao, “Design of Network Traffic Analysis Models based on Deep Neural
Networks,” Future Internet, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[30] Sethu Subramanian N et al.,
“Edge AI Bridge: A Micro-Layer Intrusion Detection Architecture for Smart-City
IoT Networks,” IoT, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-40, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Muhammad Ahmad Bilal et
al., “Dataset-Centric Evaluation of Federated Intrusion Detection Models in IoT
Networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[32] Abdulwahid Al Abdulwahid et
al., “A Hybrid Improved Binary GWO-PSO with Random Forests (IBGWO-PSO-RF) based
Intrusions Detections Models for Large-Scaled Attack in IoT Environments,” Scientific
Reports, vol. 16, no. 1, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[33] Euclides Carlos Pinto Neto et al.,
“CICIoT2023: A Real-Time Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Attacks in IoT
Environment,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1-26, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[34] Arati Behera et al.,
“Enhancing DDoS Detections in SDIoT Through Effective Features Selections with
SMOTE-ENN,” PloS one, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1-29, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[35] Ramya Chinnasamy et al.,
“Deep Learning-Driven Methods for Network-based Intrusion Detection Systems: A
Systematic Review,” ICT Express, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 181-215, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[36] S. Kumar Reddy Mallidi, and
Rajeswara Rao Ramisetty, “Bowerbird Courtship-Inspired Feature Selection for
Efficient High-Dimensional Data Analysis using a Novel Meta-Heuristic,” Discover
Computing, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1-28, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[37] Zhan Wang et al.,
“Explanatory LSTM-AE-based Anomaly Detections for Time Series Data in Marines
Transportations,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 23195-23208, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[38] Vimal Kumar Pathak, Swati
Gangwar, and Mithilesh K. Dikshit “A Comprehensive Survey on Seagulls
Optimizations Algorithms and its Variant,” Archive of Computational Method
in Engineering, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3651-3685, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google
Scholar] [Publisher
Link]